Court docket Cuts Commerce’s $910k Price Request to $123k in Massive Wheel Case

---

The Worcester Superior Court docket issued a ruling earlier this month awarding Commerce Insurance coverage Firm (“Commerce”) $123,000 or 13.5 % of its $910,000 request for lawyer charges and prices in its extended dispute with Massive Wheel Truck Gross sales, Inc. Company Checklists’ December 19, 2023 article, “Past The Bill: Commerce Awarded $24k, Seeks $910k In Charges From Tow Firm,” describes this ten-year-long lawsuit by Commerce.

The decide’s choice affords a primer on the authorized complexities of charge awards allowed to profitable litigants underneath Massachusetts Common Legal guidelines (“M.G.L.”), Chapter 93A, for partial victories involving unfair and deceptive business practices.

Background: A Ten-Year Legal Battle

As stated in Agency Checklists’ prior article, this case originated in 2014 when Commerce filed a lawsuit against Big Wheel, a heavy-duty towing company, alleging predatory billing practices. Commerce claimed that Big Wheel’s charges for unregulated towing services, equipment usage, and administrative fees—totaling $309,968.33 across 16 insured claims from 2011 to 2018—were unfair and inflated.

After a five-month, jury-waived trial that concluded in June 2023, the Court found that while Big Wheel engaged in questionable business practices, the Court found Commerce had failed to provide sufficient expert testimony to prove its central allegation of systematic overbilling for unnecessary equipment. However, the Court did rule that Big Wheel’s routine 10% “administrative fee” violated M.G.L. c. 93A, the state’s consumer protection statute, deeming it unfair and deceptive.

The Significance of the Chapter 93A Violation

The Court’s finding that Big Wheel violated Chapter 93A by charging an arbitrary and excessive administrative fee allowed Commerce, contrary to the so-called American Rule where each party to a lawsuit bears its own costs and legal fees, to recover from Big Wheel, its reasonable attorney fees, expert fees, and expenses. This violation, even on a relatively small portion of the overall claim, triggered the statute’s mandatory award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to Commerce as the prevailing party. This aspect of Chapter 93A is a powerful incentive for consumers and businesses to bring valid claims against unfair practices, even when the potential damages might be nominal. An example of this is Hanover Insurance Company v. Sutton where “The judge awarded Hanover $1.00 in nominal damages [under Chapter 93A] and $168,154.04 in attorneys’ charges and prices.

Nonetheless, the Massive Wheel case additionally highlights the challenges in proving complicated allegations of unfair practices that require professional testimony. The Court docket’s rejection of each events’ professional witnesses on the central situation of apparatus prices underscored the significance of presenting credible, goal professional testimony in such circumstances.

Evaluating the Price Request to the Award

Commerce’s December 6, 2023, charge software sought $910,708.42 in authorized charges, professional charges, and litigation prices for a lawsuit garnering a $26,000 award. This request included:

1. $529,082.88 in attorneys’ charges and $31,631.46 in bills for Commerce’s lead legislation agency McGovern & Ganem

2. $134,692.35 in charges/prices for added agency Smith & Brink

3. Professional witness charges totaling $206,639.23

4. $16,690.50 in trial transcript prices

The Court docket’s remaining award was $123,168.37—simply 13.5% of the requested quantity. This important discount displays the Court docket’s cautious software of authorized ideas governing charge awards, notably in circumstances of partial success.

The Decide’s Reasoning: Exclusions, Reductions, and the Lodestar Technique

Decide Valerie A. Yarashus’s choice illustrates the courts’ nuanced method to charge awards in complicated litigation. The decide employed the lodestar methodology, which entails multiplying the variety of hours fairly spent on the case by an hourly price for the attorneys concerned based mostly on their expertise, potential, and market price, with potential changes based mostly on the outcomes obtained.

Key points of the decide’s evaluation included:

1. Exclusions: The Court docket excluded $89,585.96 in charges and bills unrelated to the claims on which Commerce prevailed or concerned unsuccessful litigation methods. These reductions included time spent on dismissed circumstances, unrelated issues, and unsuccessful motions.

2. Partial Success Discount: After exclusions, the Court docket diminished the remaining $821,122.46 to only 15% ($123,168.37) to account for Commerce’s restricted success. The decide explicitly said that the 15% determine was decided “after reviewing the proof for the prevailing and non-prevailing parts of the 93A declare.”

3. Reasonableness of Charges and Time: The Court docket discovered the hourly charges and the general time spent affordable, given the case’s complexity and period.

4. Interrelated Claims: The decide acknowledged that some work was interrelated between the profitable and unsuccessful claims, justifying a discount reasonably than an entire exclusion of those charges.

Methods for Insurers Shifting Ahead with Chapter 93A Actions

In mild of this choice, insurers ought to contemplate the next methods in considering a 93A motion just like the Massive Wheel case, the place the damages recoverable are minimal, and the opportunity of recovering lawyer charges is a cloth issue:

1. Cautious Case Analysis: Totally assess the energy of every declare and the standard of accessible professional testimony earlier than pursuing prolonged, complicated litigation.

2. Strategic Use of Chapter 93A: While Chapter 93A provides a powerful tool for addressing unfair practices, insurers should be prepared for rigorous scrutiny of fee requests, especially in cases of partial success.

3. Meticulous Record-Keeping: Implement stringent billing practices that clearly delineate work related to different claims or theories of the case.

4. Expert Witness Selection: Invest in finding and preparing credible, objective expert witnesses who can withstand judicial scrutiny.

5. Settlement Considerations: Given the unpredictability of fee awards in partial victory cases, consider the potential for early settlement more seriously.

6. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Carefully weigh the potential benefits of prolonged litigation against the costs, considering the possibility of reduced fee awards in cases of partial success.

7. Detailed Billing Practices: Maintain clear, detailed billing records that can withstand judicial scrutiny, as courts may conduct line-by-line analyses of fee requests.

8. Anticipate Partial Success: When pursuing multiple claims or theories, be prepared for the possibility of succeeding on only some aspects and how this might affect fee recovery.

In conclusion, the Commerce Insurance vs. Big Wheel Truck Sales fee award decision reminds us of the complexities and potential pitfalls of pursuing lengthy, multi-faceted litigation. While it reaffirms the power of Chapter 93A in addressing unfair business practices, it also underscores that courts are parsimonious in ensuring that fee awards reflect the actual success achieved.

For a copy of the Court’s Fee award decision, click HERE